QUESTIONS

Q#1:

1. What were your concerns about in an SQR? What would you like the group to consider, respond to, or evaluate in an SQR of yours?

R#1:

My manly concerns were that my peers would actually get the article in a different manner than did since not all the people understand things the same but more than that is that i would not get the main point right and my whole story would go in the wrong direction. It would be a really nice gesture from the group to consider that i prefer to listen to the point of view of others and then give mine since it makes me more confident when i hear the idea or words of others before mine so i could have a clear way of knowing if i was in the right track. In evaluating i know am good at expressing my ideas so it becomes a good option for me when people evaluate my work because i get the idea of what people think of the way i organize my work.

Q#2:

How did you see evaluate the comments you made on your peers papers? Honestly did you think they were really helpful? (its OK if you say no, if that's the case, please state what made you unable to provide specific comments as you wished. It's important for me how carefully you read your peers papers and how did you work on commenting on your friends paper).

R#2

I did actually read the articles that i gave my opinion in i had no idea of what clearly to say but i read it and tried to give not only a supporting comment but a helpful one, one that next time they would start writing they would remember not to do the same mistake or not only mistake but also to consider the grammar and the way the ideas are organized. While i was reading my peers papers i was looking for similarities and difference's but then i realized that i was doing wrong but i started to look for things that could help them do better so they would do the same.